![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:53 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Was reading this post about Ferrari and it's !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , and I couldn't help but wonder what the F40 looked like without the wing. Gas Monkey threatened to do it, but in a quick google search I couldn't find any examples of it happening (thank god, please don't prove me wrong).
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
This is what photoshop was made for.
Not horrible, but I'd never do it. thoughts?
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:55 |
|
NOPE. IT IS BLASPHEMY!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:55 |
|
I don't like
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:56 |
|
MAKE IT GO AWAY!!!!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:56 |
|
This makes me very uncomfortable. It's like I'm looking at something out of Factory5.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:56 |
|
If there is no wing, it could use a lip like the 288.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:57 |
|
I actually like it, but I think if it was done this way they would have smoothed the hard edges of the backend some.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:57 |
|
I love it from the back, but from any other view it looks awkward.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:58 |
|
i like the third shot. The rest is meh.
Give that poor F40 some redbull!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:58 |
|
It's not bad. Its disconcerting to see because its such an iconic part of the car, but I'm trying to picture it as if this is the way it always was and its not bad. That rear shot makes no sense now, but for the most part...it works.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 12:58 |
|
NOPE. THAT IS BLASPHEMY!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:00 |
|
Definitely would help.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:00 |
|
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if this car had no wing, it wouldn't be legendary
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:00 |
|
Needs wing. Wing makes it look right
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:01 |
|
I actually have to look at that third shot closely, my mind just fills in the wing because I'm so used to seeing it.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:02 |
|
Actually surprisingly decent. Looks a little more sleek, I kinda like it.
Obviously if I had one I would never do it, but as a photoshop exercise, really not bad.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:03 |
|
Pretty sure that's a Corvette, dude. A C4 perhaps?
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:04 |
|
I had the exact same thought when making it, the rear is totally c4 without the wing.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:04 |
|
The rear shot looks tough, very masculine. It's yelling, "I'm wide as fuck and don't care what you have to say about it!"
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:05 |
|
I 'shopped one a while back for curiosity too -
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:07 |
|
You could say the same about this:
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:07 |
|
It also says "LOOK HOW FUCKING SQUARE I AM"
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:10 |
|
I actually think it's better! Much like the Countach looks better with no wing.
Now would someone remove the wing on the F50 as well?
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:11 |
|
Love it.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:11 |
|
Now if you really want to talk blasphemy...
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:13 |
|
Yes .
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:13 |
|
looks good with or without but I definitely prefer with.
it's looks good in this shot tho.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:33 |
|
Yes, this. Or a chamfered corner, or anything to reduce the squareness.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:38 |
|
Nope!
110% not as good in my book.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:38 |
|
Yes! F50 next!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:39 |
|
To piss off more people/make it classy, I'd have it black if it had no wing. It looks great.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:43 |
|
F50 would be a lot more difficult as the wing is actually incorporated into the belt line and everything is a lot more fluid.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:45 |
|
Except for oh I dunno, the Corvette has a 1-piece wraparound glass hatch and the F40 has rear quarter windows and a plastic, louvered hatch with a big frame around it?
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:46 |
|
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:48 |
|
This looks pretty fantastic, but I prefer it with the wing. Kind of finishes off the car.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:56 |
|
Like a squared off McLaren F1
![]() 01/23/2014 at 13:59 |
|
You kind of get the idea from the GT version though. It has a different bodykit, so it would still be interesting to see.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 14:03 |
|
I like it without the wing.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 14:04 |
|
LOVE IT!
![]() 01/23/2014 at 14:05 |
|
I was referring to the mostly-flat top line of the fender running from above the wheel to the end of the car, and the roundness of the wheel arches. A bit like in this picture:
Although I see now that the C4 didn't have as straight a profile on the rear as I remembered. Whatever...
Anyways, it's OK if you disagree. When we look up at the clouds, each of us sees a different animal floating by.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 14:39 |
|
Nope, nope, nope.
It just doesn't look right.
An 80's race car that can driven on the street needs a big ass wing.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 15:03 |
|
I imagine these images supposedly show an F40 without a wing. My brain automatically forces all viewing of an F40 to have a rear wing present.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 15:48 |
|
That is so cool. I don't care if others will judge; I've decided I'm putting on a big ass wing on my mustang, either an STI type one, or a supra/gtfour type of arch, or something like that f40 one. Again I don't care if it's tasteless; I have no notion of taste so people who will be offended can eat me.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 16:09 |
|
Thanks for the hat tip! And nice 'shops.
The 3/4 view isn't bad, but honestly, in profile, the wing helps continue the wedge shape, so I'm in the "keep it" camp.
![]() 01/23/2014 at 16:10 |
|
Ha! That looks ridiculous...
![]() 01/23/2014 at 17:28 |
|
Gives the car some kind of gentleman's Ferrari flair, I love it!
![]() 01/24/2014 at 10:18 |
|
I kind of like it, I have to admit. Clearly I'm not a Ferrari purist, just point me to the bonfire with a stake and I'll be on my way.
But something entirely different caught my eye.. Comparing the static shots to the road shot, there's a huge difference on ground clearance. Does it compress that much at speed or is it just a matter of someone lowering the beast?
![]() 01/24/2014 at 14:23 |
|
STOP MAKING ME FEEL THESE FEELINGS! I thought I'd really hate all this, and while I would never prefer this version, it really makes you look at the car and its design in a different way...
![]() 01/26/2014 at 17:40 |
|
Wow...um...that looks not what I thought it would...mostly because I've never tried to think of it. But I definitely prefer the wing. It looks rather weird and awkward without it.
![]() 01/26/2014 at 17:41 |
|
What in the fuck
![]() 01/26/2014 at 17:41 |
|
Yeah I literally had to look at them twice.